Think inside your AI world.
A funding round, against a company you passed on
The funding record — the databases and deal wires you already pay for — is loud by design: hundreds of raises a week, across sectors and stages you do not touch. What you actually need is the round that lands on a company you looked at and passed, at a size or a backer that tests the exact reason you said no — and that is a line the feed cannot hold, because the reason you passed is yours.
Read the funding record through Unl — the paid databases included, since the sources you already license are the better ones — and it arrives measured against the calls you settled, so instead of a deal stream you get the single raise that lands on a company you passed on, at terms that press the reason you passed, with why it crosses. The one, not the thousand.
What the funding-round record publishes
The funding-round record is a real signal, and there is a lot of it:
- Hundreds of raises a week across every stage, sector and geography
- Every announcement at once, the one that matters beside the hundred that do not
- Thousands of companies, almost none of which you ever evaluated
- No idea which round lands on a call you already made — that context is not in the wire
The line the feed can't hold
Say you evaluated a company and passed, and recorded why: I passed because the market looked too small to justify the price; if they raise a large round from an investor who prices markets well, my reason for passing is under pressure. That condition is a decision you made; it is not a column the deal feed models.
The reason the line is yours is the whole point. A deal feed can list every raise; it cannot know which companies you diligence-d and declined, or the specific reason you declined, or that a seed round is noise to you while a large, well-priced round in the exact name you passed on is a reason to reopen the file.
The frame judges the data it is given; it does not verify the source’s accuracy.
The one that crosses
So when a company you passed on raises at a size and from a backer that tests the reason you passed, it crosses — and the other two hundred raises that week do not. Through Unl the answer arrives as a verdict: the company you declined just raised on terms that press the reason you gave for passing, so the call you settled is worth revisiting — here is the round, read against your reasoning. Same public record; a decision instead of a digest.
You didn't ask — it was already there
You did not ask for it. The reason you passed was already recorded, so the next time you open Claude the crossing is already in the window — read against the call you made, with the reason it cleared it — rather than waiting for you to remember which name you declined and why. You author the call once; the read applies it every time that company moves.
The answer comes back measured against what you already decided, and why.
The lane is live and open to this tool today: one box, paste anything. If it speaks MCP, Unl can reach it. Readings arrive unprompted, the data beside the criterion; Unl is a courier, not a warehouse, and keeps only your keys and the frame.
Questions people ask
How is this different from a deal alert or a portfolio-tracker feed?
An alert fires on the source’s rule — a sector, a stage, a keyword. This fires on YOUR rule: the specific companies you evaluated and passed, the reason you passed, and the kind of round that would test it, with the reasoning attached. The feed shows you every raise; the measured read shows you the one that reopens a decision you actually made, and why.
Do I get pinged the moment a round is announced?
The capability is that the crossing arrives measured against your call the next time you are working — it is already in the window, read against the reason you passed, rather than a stream you monitor. A scheduled push is a separate delivery; what the read guarantees is that when a passed-on company raises on terms that press your reasoning, it surfaces as a verdict against your decision, not as one more deal item.
Does Unl change anything in the deal databases or my pipeline?
Unl reads through the funding record, the paid databases included, and can write back on your explicit gesture — it never acts as a side effect of a read. The raise is a published fact; the reason you passed lives in Unl; the read joins them and returns a verdict, altering neither.
What if they raise, but not from the kind of backer my reason depended on?
Then it does not cross and your pass stands untested, which is itself a result. The condition you recorded had two parts, size and who priced it, because a large round from an investor who does not price markets well is not evidence against the reason you passed. Keeping both parts is what stops every raise in your rejected pile reading as a mistake. When both do land, the verdict says which of them moved, so you are re-examining a specific reason rather than a feeling about a name you turned down.
What this is
Think inside your AI world — you stay in command
Save the thoughts, decisions and targets worth keeping, each with its reasoning, carried into every AI session the moment they matter. A new unit of exchange between you and your AI: the Settled Why with standing that travels. Unprompted.
Your whole AI world. What you decided at the epicentre. It plugs into Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and Cursor as an MCP connector — quick to connect, in a couple of steps.
MCP native·Human settled·Model agnostic·Your data
Frontier Frame
Connect Unl to watch the world against what you decided.
A crossing arrives when the world bears on your position.
The full product, open. Free at launch.