Think inside your AI world.
Google Calendar + Linear through Unl
Your calendar fills independently of what you’ve committed to build. When the two collide, you find out mid-week — too late.
Calendar + Linear through Unl reads meeting load and committed work together against the weekly-capacity ceiling you ratified, so over-commitment is flagged before the week starts — with the hours and the reason — not discovered on Thursday.
The criterion that binds them
You ratified a capacity ceiling: a maximum of committed build-hours in a week once meetings are subtracted, because past that line quality and the roadmap both slip.
The two naked reads
Calendar returns your meetings; Linear returns your committed issues and estimates. Each accurate and unaware of the other, so the collision between them stays invisible until it happens.
The one measured answer
Measured against your ceiling: meetings take 14 hours this week; committed Linear work estimates at 32; together that’s 6 hours over your ceiling — you’re over-committed before Monday, and the lever is either the meetings or the scope.
And back again
When you decide to drop a recurring meeting to protect build time, that call is ratified in Unl — and the next capacity read counts the week against the choice you made.
The answer comes back measured against what you already decided, and why.
A router can show your calendar next to your issues. It cannot tell you you’re over-committed, because the capacity ceiling — and why it’s set where it is — lives in neither calendar nor tracker.
The lane is live and open to this tool today: one box, paste anything. If it speaks MCP, Unl can reach it. Readings arrive unprompted, the data beside the criterion; Unl is a courier, not a warehouse, and keeps only your keys and the frame.
Read further
Questions people ask
Can AI warn me when I'm over-committed for the week?
Yes, through Unl. You ratify a weekly capacity ceiling (committed build-hours after meetings, with your reasoning), and Calendar and Linear are read together against it — the answer flags over-commitment before the week starts, with the hours.
Why can't my calendar do this alone?
Your calendar sees meetings, not committed work; your tracker sees the reverse. The ceiling that binds them lives in Unl, so only a read measured against it catches the collision.
Does Unl edit my calendar or board?
Unl reads through your calendar and board, and can write back on your explicit gesture — it never acts as a side effect of a read.
What if the interruptions never reach my calendar?
Then the ceiling is subtracting only the meetings someone booked, and the hours it leaves you are more generous than the week actually is. Your capacity rule assumes the calendar is a fair record of what the week takes; unscheduled interruption is invisible to it. The read can only measure what is recorded, and saying so is more useful than a confident number that quietly overstates the room you have.
What this is
Think inside your AI world — you stay in command
Save the thoughts, decisions and targets worth keeping, each with its reasoning, carried into every AI session the moment they matter. A new unit of exchange between you and your AI: the Settled Why with standing that travels. Unprompted.
Your whole AI world. What you decided at the epicentre. It plugs into Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and Cursor as an MCP connector — quick to connect, in a couple of steps.
MCP native·Human settled·Model agnostic·Your data
Measured Context
Connect Unl to bring the right information into the moment.
Your sources, read against the criteria you set.
The full product, open. Free at launch.