Think inside your AI world.

Figma + Linear through Unl

A build can match the mockup pixel for pixel and still break the principles the design was meant to hold. Whether it honours them is a check that spans the design and the tracker.

Figma + Linear through Unl reads the shipped build against the design principles you settled, so “does this hold to how we design?” is answered against the rules, with any breach named. The principles are held in Unl.

The criterion that binds them

Say you’ve ratified a small set of design principles — the interaction rules, the accessibility floor, the states every component must handle — because a build that matches one mockup can still miss the rules that make the whole product coherent.

The two naked reads

Figma returns the design, its components and variables. Linear returns what actually shipped, issue by issue. The two are exact and unaware of each other, so whether the build honours the principles — not just the mockup — is yours to judge.

The one measured answer

Against your principles: the build matches the happy-path mockup, but two components ship without the empty and error states your principles require — so it holds the picture and breaks the rules, and it’s the missing states, not the layout, that fail.

And back again

If you relax a principle for a low-risk surface, Unl holds the amended set — and the next build is measured against the principles as you’ve now drawn them.

The answer comes back measured against what you already decided, and why.

A router can put the Figma design beside the Linear work. It can’t say the build breaks your principles, because the design principles — the rules beneath the mockups — live in neither tool.

The lane is live and open to this tool today: one box, paste anything. If it speaks MCP, Unl can reach it. Readings arrive unprompted, the data beside the criterion; Unl is a courier, not a warehouse, and keeps only your keys and the frame.

Read further

Questions people ask

Can AI check a build against our design principles?

Yes, through Unl. You ratify your design principles — interaction rules, accessibility floor, required states — and Figma and Linear are read together against them, so the build reads as holding to the rules or breaching a named one, not just matching a mockup.

Isn’t matching the mockup enough?

A build can match one mockup and still miss the states and rules that make the product coherent. The design principles beneath the mockups live in Unl, so the read checks the build against the rules, not the picture.

Does Unl change my Figma or Linear data?

Unl reads through Figma and Linear, and can write back on your explicit gesture — it never acts as a side effect of a read.

What this is

Think inside your AI world — you stay in command

Save the thoughts, decisions and targets worth keeping, each with its reasoning, carried into every AI session the moment they matter. A new unit of exchange between you and your AI: the Settled Why with standing that travels. Unprompted.

Your whole AI world. What you decided at the epicentre. It plugs into Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and Cursor as an MCP connector — quick to connect, in a couple of steps.

MCP native·Human settled·Model agnostic·Your data

Measured Context

Connect Unl to bring the right information into the moment.

Your sources, read against the criteria you set.

Join the free launch

The full product, open. Free at launch.