Think inside your AI world.
Slack + Linear through Unl
A confident message in a channel reads like a decision — but a decision is what you ratified, not what someone typed at 5pm on Friday.
Slack + Linear through Unl reads a channel “decision” against the plan of record and what you actually ratified, so the reply says whether the message reflects a real decision or contradicts one. Authority lives in Unl, not the thread.
The criterion that binds them
Say you’ve ratified a plan of record and a rule about it: the channel can propose, but only an explicit ratification changes the plan — because threads drift and the loudest message shouldn’t silently become policy.
The two naked reads
Slack returns the thread, the replies and the search across channels. Linear returns the issues and the plan of record. Both are accurate; neither knows what you ratified, so a message that sounds settled passes for settled.
The one measured answer
Against what you ratified: the thread claims the team ‘decided’ to drop the onboarding rework — but that contradicts the plan you ratified last week, and no ratification supersedes it. The message is evidence of a view, not a decision. Conversation is demoted from authority to evidence.
And back again
If you agree the thread was right, you ratify the change in Unl in the same breath — and only then does the plan of record move, with the why attached.
The answer comes back measured against what you already decided, and why.
A router can surface the Slack thread beside the Linear plan. It cannot rule that the ‘decision’ contradicts what you settled, because the ratified plan — the authority — lives in neither Slack nor Linear.
The lane is live and open to this tool today: one box, paste anything. If it speaks MCP, Unl can reach it. Readings arrive unprompted, the data beside the criterion; Unl is a courier, not a warehouse, and keeps only your keys and the frame.
Read further
Questions people ask
Can AI tell me if a Slack ‘decision’ was ever actually agreed?
Yes, through Unl. You ratify the plan of record and the rule that only an explicit ratification changes it; Slack and Linear are read against that, so a channel claim is judged as a real decision or a contradiction.
Isn’t everything in Slack already a decision?
Threads propose; they don’t ratify. The distinction — what was actually settled, and why — lives in Unl, so the read treats a confident message as evidence until it’s ratified, not as policy by volume.
Does Unl store my Slack messages?
Unl reads through Slack and Linear, and can write back on your explicit gesture — it never acts as a side effect of a read.
What this is
Think inside your AI world — you stay in command
Unlimitless (Unl to friends) holds what you've settled, reads what your tools are showing, and catches what's changed out in the world — and hands your AI whatever bears on the work, the moment it's needed, without you asking. The right thing, in front of the model, unprompted, with you in command of the call. So you keep moving toward what you set out to build, on top of everything you've already decided.
It plugs into Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and Cursor as an MCP connector. Quick to connect, in a couple of steps.
Unlimitless is open now to invited Alpha. Apply for the Beta waitlist to come in ahead of the full launch:
Alpha is invite-only · free at launch.