Think inside your AI world.
Gmail + Linear through Unl
A date promised in an email only matters against the plan it feeds — and the inbox has no idea what the roadmap needs.
Gmail + Linear through Unl reads a commitment made over email against the delivery plan it touches, judged by the timeline ruling you settled, so the reply says whether the promise keeps the plan intact or breaks it. The ruling is held in Unl.
The criterion that binds them
Say you’ve ratified a timeline ruling: the dependency dates the plan can absorb, and the ones it can’t, because a supplier slipping inside a critical window is the difference between a kept launch and a missed one.
The two naked reads
Gmail returns the thread, the quoted date and the attachment. Linear returns the issues, the cycle and the milestone that date feeds. Each is right and unaware of the other, so “does this promise threaten the plan?” is yours to judge.
The one measured answer
Against your ruling: the supplier’s emailed date lands two days inside the critical window your ruling protects — so this promise, as written, breaks the plan, and the milestone it feeds is the one you flagged as unmovable.
And back again
If you accept a renegotiated date and adjust the protected window, that decision is ratified in Unl — and the next email checked against the plan is measured on the timeline you now hold.
The answer comes back measured against what you already decided, and why.
A router can drop a Gmail date next to a Linear milestone. It cannot say the promise breaks the plan, because the timeline ruling — which windows are sacred and why — lives in neither the inbox nor the tracker.
The lane is live and open to this tool today: one box, paste anything. If it speaks MCP, Unl can reach it. Readings arrive unprompted, the data beside the criterion; Unl is a courier, not a warehouse, and keeps only your keys and the frame.
Read further
Questions people ask
Can AI check whether a supplier’s promise fits my plan?
Yes, through Unl. You ratify the timeline ruling — the windows the plan can absorb and the ones it can’t — and Gmail and Linear are read together against it, so an emailed date is judged against the milestone it affects.
Why can’t my inbox or tracker do this?
Gmail holds the promise and Linear holds the plan; neither holds your ruling on which dates are critical. That ruling lives in Unl, so only a measured read across both can call the promise safe or breaking.
Does Unl store my emails or issues?
Unl reads through Gmail and Linear, and can write back on your explicit gesture — it never acts as a side effect of a read.
What this is
Think inside your AI world — you stay in command
Unlimitless (Unl to friends) holds what you've settled, reads what your tools are showing, and catches what's changed out in the world — and hands your AI whatever bears on the work, the moment it's needed, without you asking. The right thing, in front of the model, unprompted, with you in command of the call. So you keep moving toward what you set out to build, on top of everything you've already decided.
It plugs into Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and Cursor as an MCP connector. Quick to connect, in a couple of steps.
Unlimitless is open now to invited Alpha. Apply for the Beta waitlist to come in ahead of the full launch:
Alpha is invite-only · free at launch.