Your agents don’t need to persist. Your purpose does.
Slack + GitHub through Unl
“Let’s just ship it” in a channel feels like a decision. Whether the code actually clears the bar you agreed to merge on is a different question — and it spans the chat and the repo.
Slack + GitHub through Unl reads a channel push-to-merge against the pull request’s real state, judged by the merge bar you ratified, so the reply says whether “ship it” meets your standard or overrides it. The bar is held in Unl, not the thread.
The criterion that binds them
Say you’ve ratified a merge bar: reviews approved, checks green and no open code-scanning alert — and the rule that a channel message never substitutes for it, because the loudest “ship it” shouldn’t merge unreviewed code under deadline.
The two naked reads
Slack returns the thread and the push to merge. GitHub returns the review state, the checks and the alerts. Both are accurate; neither weighs the channel’s urgency against the merge bar, so “is this actually ready?” rides on nerve.
The one measured answer
Against your bar: the thread wants it merged now, but one review is unapproved and a code-scanning alert is open — so “ship it” overrides your bar rather than meeting it, and it’s the review and the alert holding it, not the mood.
And back again
If you waive the alert with a documented reason and take the review yourself, you ratify that in Unl — and the next “ship it” is measured against the bar as you’ve now set it.
The answer comes back measured against what you already decided, and why.
A router can put the Slack push beside the GitHub state. It can’t rule that “ship it” overrides your bar, because the merge bar — and the rule that a message can’t stand in for it — lives in neither Slack nor GitHub.
It works with this tool today: one box, paste anything. If it speaks MCP, Unl can reach it. Readings arrive unprompted, the data beside the criterion; Unl is a courier, not a warehouse, and keeps only your keys and the frame.
Read further
Questions people ask
Can AI tell me if a ‘ship it’ message meets our merge standard?
Yes, through Unl. You ratify a merge bar — reviews approved, checks green, no open alert — and Slack and GitHub are read together against it, so a channel push-to-merge is judged as meeting your standard or overriding it.
Isn’t team agreement in Slack enough to ship?
Agreement is intent; the bar is the standard. The distinction — what actually has to be true to merge, regardless of urgency — lives in Unl, so the read treats “ship it” as a request to be checked, not an override.
Does Unl change my Slack or GitHub data?
Unl reads through Slack and GitHub, and can write back on your explicit gesture — it never acts as a side effect of a read.
What if the checks are green but one of them never ran?
Then the bar is not met. A required check that never ran is not the same as one that passed, so the read reports it as missing rather than green.
What this is
Your agents don’t need to persist. Your purpose does.
Save the thoughts, decisions and targets worth keeping, each with its reasoning, carried into every AI session the moment they matter. A new unit of exchange between you and your AI: the Settled Why with standing that travels. Unprompted.
Your whole AI world. What you decided at the epicentre. It works inside Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT and Cursor, and connects in a couple of steps.
MCP native·Human settled·Model agnostic·Your data
Targeted Momentum
Connect Unl for real progress on what you set out to do.
Aim, settled reasoning and target to keep long-running work moving.
The full product, open. Free to start. Paid plans from $10 a month.